Hello, Totally agree on equalizing the use of logs (log, LOG, logger, LOGGER), and so on...
If there is a best practice that does not imply adding more libraries to the existing ones, we should evaluate it. Kind regards, El sáb, 3 jun 2023 a las 17:18, Łukasz Dywicki (<l...@code-house.org>) escribió: > The static logger declaration is still a thing made by (older/elder? ;)) > java developers, mainly because log4j 1.x/commons-logging/jul loggers > were advised to be made like that. With switch to slf4j static is no > longer mandatory/strongly recommended. > Most of code I make myself rely on logger field, but I've seen people > who do it with `@Slf4j` annotation coming from Lombok. > > Anyhow, is there a intention (not yet a plan) to unify this part of our > code? > > Best, > Łukasz > > On 2.06.2023 08:35, chrisdutz (via GitHub) wrote: > > > > GitHub user chrisdutz added a comment to the discussion: [Java] How > should we handle "loggers"? > > > > And here ... even the Slf4j folks no longer recommend any general way of > doing things: https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#declared_static > > I guess in the past, there was a performance reason to to things, but > this no longer seems to apply today. > > > > GitHub link: > https://github.com/apache/plc4x/discussions/973#discussioncomment-6068178 > > > > ---- > > This is an automatically sent email for dev@plc4x.apache.org. > > To unsubscribe, please send an email to: > dev-unsubscr...@plc4x.apache.org > > > -- *CEOS Automatización, C.A.* *GALPON SERVICIO INDUSTRIALES Y NAVALES FA, C.A.,* *PISO 1, OFICINA 2, AV. RAUL LEONI, SECTOR GUAMACHITO,* *FRENTE A LA ASOCIACION DE GANADEROS,BARCELONA,EDO. ANZOATEGUI* *Ing. César García* *Cel: +58 414-760.98.95* *Hotline Técnica SIEMENS: 0800 1005080* *Email: support.aan.automat...@siemens.com <support.aan.automat...@siemens.com>*
