On Mar 27, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
No. If sourcesense is doing this as work for hire then the work
is probably owned by Microsoft.
I'm pretty sure the deal was structured so as not to be "work for
hire", for reasons just like this (amongst others). I'll let
Gianugo confirm that though, as I only know that sort of thing
second hand!
In terms of the various checks that have been done:
[...]
Thanks you Nick!
Gianugo - are you happy to make a public statement about the work
not being work-for-hire for microsoft, and the fact that you
haven't got any documentation other than the public stuff?
Hopefully that'll clarify things for everyone.
Indeed. I can confirm both statements are true. Would that be enough?
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
