David Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:On Apr 22, 2008, at 10:44 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
This is in contrast to the apparent message from the ASF that nothing is required because SourceSense has already asserted the rights via their CCLA. In which case the point has always been moot. And all is good, and all required homework was completed, and now, finally thoroughly discussed and double checked!
I do not recall SS claiming that the patent rights were granted. I recall them claiming that they were covered by the OSP. I do not recall the ASF coming to any such conclusion, only that Roy sounded an opinion (and one that I'd like him to clarify btw).
I think that Andy's is the next comment.... Regards, DaveThanks, -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com Blogging at http://boldlyopen.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Buni Meldware Communication Suite http://buni.org Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/administration.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
