Sam Ruby wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:45 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:On Apr 22, 2008, at 10:44 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:Just so it is clear: I am comfortable with POI proceeding if everybody understands that in the event that patent threats surface that I will be advocating that the affected code be remedied and/or jettisoned. I am also comfortable with assisting Andy with his efforts to reduce the possibility that this ever occurs.+1, as in not only I agree but I will be the first one to act in that case, but is this something Andy would be comfortable with?I made two statements there. I am comfortable with both. I take it that you are comfortable with the first and have no objection to the second. Andy is comfortable with the second, but would probably characterize the first as "irresponsible". As always, he is welcome to correct me at any time.
I'd even say negligent.
While I, too, can't speak FOR Microsoft, I am quite willing to speak WITH Microsoft. Particularly if the request was modestly scoped, and if doing so would sort the issue right from the start.
Which is pretty much all I'm asking of you guys.
- Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Buni Meldware Communication Suite http://buni.org Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/administration.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
