Tison, actually we already implemented it :-) I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the work as a PIP
+1 Enrico Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that > "We need a bot". > > But we already have a bot running online > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml. > So it confuses me. > > Best, > tison. > > > Anonymitaet _ <[email protected]> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道： > >> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal ( >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)? >> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details. >> >> From: tison <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30 >> To: pulsar-users <[email protected]> >> Cc: Dev <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of >> Developing Docs >> >> Isn't >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml >> already into use? >> >> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve. >> >> Best, >> tison. >> >> >> PengHui Li <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 于2021年11月4日周四 >> 上午8:05写道： >> +1 >> >> Penghui >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi Pulsar Community, >> >> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109). >> >> The issue for this PIP 109 is here >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595. >> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and >> all details about Doc Bot. >> >> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks! >> >> Anonymitaet >> >
