Aha. Get it. +1
Best, tison. Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午4:29写道： > Tison, > actually we already implemented it :-) > > I believe this thread is only for having a formal process and record the > work as a PIP > > > +1 > > Enrico > > Il giorno gio 4 nov 2021 alle ore 07:46 tison <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > >> Yes I read it. It describes a lot of details which I can conclude is that >> "We need a bot". >> >> But we already have a bot running online >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml. >> So it confuses me. >> >> Best, >> tison. >> >> >> Anonymitaet _ <[email protected]> 于2021年11月4日周四 下午2:41写道： >> >>> Hi Tison, have you ever read through this proposal ( >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit)? >>> It documents problems solved by the Bot and our implementation details. >>> >>> From: tison <[email protected]> >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 14:30 >>> To: pulsar-users <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Dev <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [Vote] PIP 109: Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency of >>> Developing Docs >>> >>> Isn't >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-documentbot.yml >>> already into use? >>> >>> From the proposal I don't know what the problem is to solve. >>> >>> Best, >>> tison. >>> >>> >>> PengHui Li <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>> 于2021年11月4日周四 上午8:05写道： >>> +1 >>> >>> Penghui >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:33 PM Anonymitaet _ <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> Hi Pulsar Community, >>> >>> I’m starting a thread to vote on Pulsar Doc Bot (PIP 109). >>> >>> The issue for this PIP 109 is here >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12595. >>> It documents the design proposal, solution, implementation progress, and >>> all details about Doc Bot. >>> >>> Please VOTE within 72 hours. Thanks! >>> >>> Anonymitaet >>> >>
