Dave, Having a new repo will make it harder for developers to contribute documentation.
Usually engineers do it like and do not have time to write docs. If we ask them to create two PRs only to add, for instance, a new configuration option, then it would be somehow a pain. I am not saying that we shouldn't go this way, but it would be kind of a pain for someone and we need to ear more voices. Enrico Il Mer 17 Nov 2021, 19:28 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I think we should have a PIP for this. Because this impacts all the > developers who are making documentation changes. > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:46 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > There are two efforts happening in the community around website refresh. > > > > (1) Docusaurus upgrades. > > (2) New web design. > > > > There is an effort to eliminate all the extra commits in the asf-site > > branch of the main repository. In that thread I proposed a new repository > > for the website. > > > > We can then discuss migration and development both on this mailing list > > and as PRs and Issues in that repository. > > > > Do we want to have a PIP process here or can we be less formal? I think > > that PRs. Issues, and simple commits can be sufficient. > > > > Unless there are objections I will create a new repository - pulsar-site > > on Friday in 72 hours. > > ‘ > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > >
