I’ve updated my fork of apache/pulsar I’m not seeing how to run the workflow "CI - Pulsar Website build”. Any ideas?
If not then I’m going to need to test locally and it will take some time to ready it. > On Nov 17, 2021, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, that should work. > > After that we can go ahead and remove `asf-site` from the main repo, > although we need to make it "unprotected" to be able to do so. Yes once we have moved over to the new then we can ask Infra to take care of the branch protection along with deleting it. When I create the new repository I will copy all of the asf-site branch which will take care of transferring the parts of the site not actively being built. Regards, Dave > > > -- > Matteo Merli > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:46 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> If we change ORIGIN_REPO[1] to point to a new pulsar-site repos. >> Then with the correct .asf.yaml file changes we can remove the asf-site >> branch. >> I see that the publish is run from this workflow [2] >> Let me think about a PR to make the move. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/7a34cebca25e6e584e8b758e6bd58c1c4fe8a58e/site2/tools/publish-website.sh#L25 >> [2] >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/.github/workflows/ci-pulsar-website-build.yaml >> >> >>> On Nov 17, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/site2/tools/publish-website.sh >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matteo Merli >>> <matteo.me...@gmail.com> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:29 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Show me where the code is that commits to the asf-site branch. >>>> >>>>> On Nov 17, 2021, at 12:25 PM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I agree with that. >>>>> >>>>> I understand that there are tradeoffs for each approach, though the >>>>> original intention was to allow for doc changes to be committed in the >>>>> same PR as the code change. That doesn't have to be the case always, >>>>> especially for larger multi-PR changes, but it makes it easier to do >>>>> quick corrections to the docs. >>>>> >>>>> I think the bigger problem here is to get rid of the generated site >>>>> HTML stuff from the main pulsar repo. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matteo Merli >>>>> <matteo.me...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 12:16 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave, >>>>>> Having a new repo will make it harder for developers to contribute >>>>>> documentation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Usually engineers do it like and do not have time to write docs. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we ask them to create two PRs only to add, for instance, a new >>>>>> configuration option, then it would be somehow a pain. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not saying that we shouldn't go this way, but it would be kind of a >>>>>> pain for someone and we need to ear more voices. >>>>>> >>>>>> Enrico >>>>>> >>>>>> Il Mer 17 Nov 2021, 19:28 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we should have a PIP for this. Because this impacts all the >>>>>>> developers who are making documentation changes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Sijie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:46 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi - >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are two efforts happening in the community around website >>>>>>>> refresh. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (1) Docusaurus upgrades. >>>>>>>> (2) New web design. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is an effort to eliminate all the extra commits in the asf-site >>>>>>>> branch of the main repository. In that thread I proposed a new >>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>> for the website. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We can then discuss migration and development both on this mailing list >>>>>>>> and as PRs and Issues in that repository. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do we want to have a PIP process here or can we be less formal? I think >>>>>>>> that PRs. Issues, and simple commits can be sufficient. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unless there are objections I will create a new repository - >>>>>>>> pulsar-site >>>>>>>> on Friday in 72 hours. >>>>>>>> ‘ >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>
