+1. Looks good to me. Do we need to move the `Apache Pulsar / Multi Clients` Github project to the corresponding repos?
Thanks, Zike Yang Zike Yang On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -- > Matteo Merli > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Great proposal, thanks Matteo. > > > > I think I agree with splitting out the client into two repos. One > > issue is that new C++ features will lag in the python client because > > the C++ client will first need to be released. Quick releases will > > likely help there. > > Yes, decoupling Java, C++ and Python releases will make each of them > much easier. > > We'll be able to do patch releases with a tenth of the manual work involved. > > > > The client <--> broker compatibility is in general always guaranteed. > > > > I think we should make this more visible in our Pulsar documentation. > > It's a fantastic feature, and I get the sense that it is not well > > known. > > Agree, it's something that still surprises a lot of people.
