+100 to this ! Thanks for this proposal
Enrico Il giorno lun 26 set 2022 alle ore 10:04 Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > +1. Looks good to me. > > Do we need to move the `Apache Pulsar / Multi Clients` Github project > to the corresponding repos? > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > Zike Yang > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Great proposal, thanks Matteo. > > > > > > I think I agree with splitting out the client into two repos. One > > > issue is that new C++ features will lag in the python client because > > > the C++ client will first need to be released. Quick releases will > > > likely help there. > > > > Yes, decoupling Java, C++ and Python releases will make each of them > > much easier. > > > > We'll be able to do patch releases with a tenth of the manual work involved. > > > > > > The client <--> broker compatibility is in general always guaranteed. > > > > > > I think we should make this more visible in our Pulsar documentation. > > > It's a fantastic feature, and I get the sense that it is not well > > > known. > > > > Agree, it's something that still surprises a lot of people.
