+1 binding Although I think we should use more unique keys for system properties in pulsar, e.g. reserve all properties prefixed with "PULSAR_" for system internal usage. But it's another topic as we already have "RECONSUMETIMES".
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:27 PM Nitin Goyal <nitin.goyal....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello community, > > I'm starting the VOTE for PIP-239: Retry Mechanism per Message title. > > Motivation: We are working on a project where each message has their retry > as per the requirements. like one message 100 times and other messages 5 > times and so on. This feature also adds an extra functionality while > comparing existing queueing services like RabbitMQ or SQS etc. > > For more details please find the detailed PIP at: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19136 > > Discussion Threads: > 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/rn6114xxtx1j57yy2jbmdv4xzt80o1hz > 2. https://lists.apache.org/thread/b9rfv6t307z439xx3zt2ym4p140qzp06 > > Proposed changes in pulsar go client library. > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pull/939 > > Thanks > Nitin Goyal
