-1 (binding) because the discussion thread is in progress and most important you only allowed for 71 hours of discussion.
I think it is important that any change to the main producer / consumer flow be proven to have no performance regressions in the broker. Regards, Dave > On Jan 8, 2023, at 11:35 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am sure that this is a good idea. > > -1 (binding) > > I will follow up on the discussion thread > > I am sorry I am catching up late on this thread > > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 9 gen 2023 alle ore 03:51 Ran Gao <r...@apache.org> ha scritto: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Ran Gao >> >> On 2023/01/08 15:05:31 Zixuan Liu wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zixuan >>> >>> Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> 于2023年1月8日周日 22:38写道： >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Yunze >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 4:46 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Zike Yang >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 3:22 PM Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 binding >>>>>> >>>>>> Although I think we should use more unique keys for system properties >>>> in pulsar, >>>>>> e.g. reserve all properties prefixed with "PULSAR_" for system >>>> internal usage. >>>>>> But it's another topic as we already have "RECONSUMETIMES". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 12:27 PM Nitin Goyal <nitin.goyal....@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello community, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm starting the VOTE for PIP-239: Retry Mechanism per Message title. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Motivation: We are working on a project where each message has their >>>> retry >>>>>>> as per the requirements. like one message 100 times and other >>>> messages 5 >>>>>>> times and so on. This feature also adds an extra functionality while >>>>>>> comparing existing queueing services like RabbitMQ or SQS etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For more details please find the detailed PIP at: >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19136 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Discussion Threads: >>>>>>> 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread/rn6114xxtx1j57yy2jbmdv4xzt80o1hz >>>>>>> 2. https://lists.apache.org/thread/b9rfv6t307z439xx3zt2ym4p140qzp06 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Proposed changes in pulsar go client library. >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pull/939 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Nitin Goyal >>>> >>>
