+1 Great idea
Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 08:23 Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > This is a good idea, and then we must provide a document on building the > own connector image and python functions runtime image. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月6日周三 07:04写道： > > > The docker image `pulsar-all` is a convenience image that is created on > top > > of the base `pulsar` image, including all the Pulsar IO connectors as > well > > as the tiered storage offloaders. > > > > The Dockerfile for `pulsar-all` can be found here: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/docker/pulsar-all/Dockerfile > > > > The resulting image is very big: > > > > ``` > > apachepulsar/pulsar-all 3.1.2 > > 3d1aa250bf6c 2 months ago 3.68GB > > ``` > > > > This poses a challenge in many ways: > > 1. Our CI pipeline needs to build these images and cache them across > > different stages of the pipeline > > 2. It takes a lot of time for release managers to build and push these > > images to Docker Hub > > 3. Users using this image in production see very long download times, > > something that can affect the availability of the system (eg: more > chances > > of a 2nd broker to crash if a restart takes a very long time). > > 4. It's very unlikely that one user will require all the connectors, > most > > likely, it would use just 2-3 of them. > > > > The problem is that `pulsar-all` was introduced at a time when there were > > ~3 Pulsar IO connectors. Right now we do have 35 connectors, with a 1.9 > GB > > total size. > > > > The proposal here is to drop this image altogether. Users will be able to > > construct their own targeted images in a very simple way: > > > > ``` > > FROM apachepulsar/pulsar:latest > > RUN mkdir -p connectors && \ > > cd connectors && \ > > wget > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/pulsar/pulsar-3.2.0/connectors/pulsar-io-elastic-search-3.2.0.nar > > ``` > > > > > > > > ### Pulsar Functions Python Runtime > > > > In order to support Python functions runtime, we have been including the > > Pulsar base image with quite a bit of dependencies, from `pulsar-client` > > Python SDK, to gRPC which is quite a heavy package with many transitive > > dependencies. > > > > Given that the vast majority would be using the `pulsar` base image to > run > > brokers and not python functions, it would make sense to split the Python > > support into a different image, like `pulsar-functions-python`, which > > extends from the base image and adds all the needed Python dependencies. > > > > This way it will be very easy for users to select the appropriate image > and > > we wouldn't be carrying a big amount of useless Python dependencies to > > users who don't need them. > > > > > > What are people's opinions with respect to this? > > > > Matteo > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > >
