+1 Most users don't need all built-in connectors, it's too bloated.
Best Regards, Ran Gao On 2024/03/05 23:02:37 Matteo Merli wrote: > The docker image `pulsar-all` is a convenience image that is created on top > of the base `pulsar` image, including all the Pulsar IO connectors as well > as the tiered storage offloaders. > > The Dockerfile for `pulsar-all` can be found here: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/docker/pulsar-all/Dockerfile > > The resulting image is very big: > > ``` > apachepulsar/pulsar-all 3.1.2 > 3d1aa250bf6c 2 months ago 3.68GB > ``` > > This poses a challenge in many ways: > 1. Our CI pipeline needs to build these images and cache them across > different stages of the pipeline > 2. It takes a lot of time for release managers to build and push these > images to Docker Hub > 3. Users using this image in production see very long download times, > something that can affect the availability of the system (eg: more chances > of a 2nd broker to crash if a restart takes a very long time). > 4. It's very unlikely that one user will require all the connectors, most > likely, it would use just 2-3 of them. > > The problem is that `pulsar-all` was introduced at a time when there were > ~3 Pulsar IO connectors. Right now we do have 35 connectors, with a 1.9 GB > total size. > > The proposal here is to drop this image altogether. Users will be able to > construct their own targeted images in a very simple way: > > ``` > FROM apachepulsar/pulsar:latest > RUN mkdir -p connectors && \ > cd connectors && \ > wget > https://downloads.apache.org/pulsar/pulsar-3.2.0/connectors/pulsar-io-elastic-search-3.2.0.nar > ``` > > > > ### Pulsar Functions Python Runtime > > In order to support Python functions runtime, we have been including the > Pulsar base image with quite a bit of dependencies, from `pulsar-client` > Python SDK, to gRPC which is quite a heavy package with many transitive > dependencies. > > Given that the vast majority would be using the `pulsar` base image to run > brokers and not python functions, it would make sense to split the Python > support into a different image, like `pulsar-functions-python`, which > extends from the base image and adds all the needed Python dependencies. > > This way it will be very easy for users to select the appropriate image and > we wouldn't be carrying a big amount of useless Python dependencies to > users who don't need them. > > > What are people's opinions with respect to this? > > Matteo > > -- > Matteo Merli > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> >
