+1 from me as well.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Nozomi Kurihara <nkuri...@yahoo-corp.jp> wrote: > + 1 for releasing RC version early > > > ________________________________ > 差出人: Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> > 送信日時: 2018年4月19日 4:24 > 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org > 件名: Re: Plan for Pulsar 2.0 release > > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jai Asher <jai.ashe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for releasing the RC early >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:52 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 for releasing an RC version prior to an official release. >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi everyone, >> > > >> > > I think we are approaching the completion of most major items that were >> > > scheduled for 2.0 release. >> > > >> > > Since there is a big number of items that went in, like for example: >> > > * Migrating BookKeeper from Yahoo branch based on 4.3 to main Apache >> 4.7 >> > > * Schema >> > > * Topic Compaction >> > > * Functions >> > > * Client API refactorings >> > > >> > > I would suggest to have a "2.0.0-RC1" release, still officially >> released >> > > with regular process, so that we'll have a chance to iron out any bugs, >> > > tools or packaging issue before marking 2.0 as "stable". >> > > >> > > My idea is use next week to finish up all the pending tasks and >> > > documentation changes and kickoff the release process for 2.0.0-rc1 in >> > the >> > > week after. >> > > >> > > Any thoughts with respect to this? >> > > >> > > Matteo >> > > -- >> > > Matteo Merli >> > > <mme...@apache.org> >> > > >> > >>
