Is it possible to have 2.0.0alpha on a Maven Central release? Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 9:12 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > > Why not call it 2.0.0Alpha1, or 2.0.0Beta1? Calling it RC will be > confusing for people who haven't read this conversation. The only > problem with alpha or beta is that you won't get a 2.0.0 release in > the end, but a 2.0.1. Many people don't trust '.0' releases anyhow > though. > > -Ivan > >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Sahaya Andrews <andr...@apache.org> wrote: >> +1 from me as well. >> >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Nozomi Kurihara <nkuri...@yahoo-corp.jp> >>> wrote: >>> + 1 for releasing RC version early >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> 差出人: Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> >>> 送信日時: 2018年4月19日 4:24 >>> 宛先: dev@pulsar.incubator.apache.org >>> 件名: Re: Plan for Pulsar 2.0 release >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jai Asher <jai.ashe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for releasing the RC early >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:52 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 for releasing an RC version prior to an official release. >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we are approaching the completion of most major items that were >>>>>> scheduled for 2.0 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Since there is a big number of items that went in, like for example: >>>>>> * Migrating BookKeeper from Yahoo branch based on 4.3 to main Apache >>>> 4.7 >>>>>> * Schema >>>>>> * Topic Compaction >>>>>> * Functions >>>>>> * Client API refactorings >>>>>> >>>>>> I would suggest to have a "2.0.0-RC1" release, still officially >>>> released >>>>>> with regular process, so that we'll have a chance to iron out any bugs, >>>>>> tools or packaging issue before marking 2.0 as "stable". >>>>>> >>>>>> My idea is use next week to finish up all the pending tasks and >>>>>> documentation changes and kickoff the release process for 2.0.0-rc1 in >>>>> the >>>>>> week after. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any thoughts with respect to this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Matteo >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matteo Merli >>>>>> <mme...@apache.org> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>
