On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:28:44AM -0500, Scott Carr wrote: > [...] > For this particular issue, it should have had a keyword of needmoreinfo > added, and if no response was given in a timely fashion it should have > been placed in a resolved state of either INVALID do to not enough > information, or a state of LATER, if the developer feels there will be > more information LATER.
No. Not in this case. He should have added the needmoreinfo keyword, but as this issue was initially filed as a P1 issue closing it fast is appropriate. The higher the prio, the lower the response time, the faster an issue will be rejected if it doesn't contain the necessary information.. So the only mistake was that he did not add the needmoreinfo keyword. And again: dvo made clear that he did want another issue filed with additional information, and not keeping the current one since the current one already did contain too much unrelated information. > I would think for this issue a status of LATER would be good due to the > fact that the issue the developer is having is that the Stack Trace > program is flawed which is supposed to be fixed in a new release which > would then provide valid stack traces for him to figure out the problem. No. IMHO LATER & REMIND should be removed from issuezilla as this basically means: "Forget about this issue" - There are so many other issues that it is very unlikely that anyone will have a look at resolved issues. (And as I wrote: a new issue that only focuses on the reported problem was requested. Keeping the messy one doesn't make sense) ciao Christian -- NP: Korn - Thoughtless --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
