Hi, -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Von: Thorsten Ziehm <[email protected]>
> > While I'd prefer that the verified ones get closed automatically by > > EIS directly after integration (that notification is then also a > > reminder for the reporter that the issue hit the master and can/should > > be double-checked) and not half a year (or some other period) later, I > > support the proposal. > > Why? What are the benefits? > > With this proposal it's up to the owner of an issue to check it again in > Master, if he think the issue has to be checked again. I heard this is > needed/wanted in some cases. Therefore we decided to do not promote the > automated closing of an issue by a tool. I agree here. I was one o the people who asked for the possibility of manual closing. If we automatically close right after integration, we have no idea, if someone had a look afterrwards. If we leaveit open for a while, "closing" means exatly this - someone had a look. And (at least to me) it is more efficient to work on a set of issies thet can easiliy quried than to dig a pile of automated mails, So - my full support for the proposal as it is. André -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
