Hi, with the upcoming migration of the OOo web site to a new infrastructure (http://website.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11196), we will also move from collab.net's IssueZilla to a recent version of Bugzilla.
(the migration progress with respect to BZ is, at the moment, tracked at http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/IssueZillaMigration and http://kenai.com/projects/ooo-migration/pages/Bugzilla-TODO, if you're interested in) In this course, of course all the issue data and such will be migrated. We will also have the chance to do other customizations, for instance to the workflow (as an example, we'll be able to solve this NEW/ACCEPTED/STARTED problem by having a dedicated ACCEPTED issue status). One thing I'd be interested in getting feedback for is the following question: Do we need the issue types ENHANCEMENT and PATCH? ENHANCEMENT isn't really different from FEATURE (at least in practice, though in theory you could define them differently), so it seems to be superfluous. PATCH, then, could effectively be a TASK with an attachment of type "Patch". So, what's your opinion? Should we use that chance to consolidate our issue types? Thanks & Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [email protected] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
