I understand it completely, but I'll give my +1 only if the next version will be 1.10.1(-SNAPSHOT). The only problem I have is to release major releases often, if it's actually not a major release. I don't have problems with more often minor-releases.
regards, - Robert From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:45:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [qdox-dev] Re: missing jar deps while building model Robert, One of Joe's hopes is 'release early and release often'. Thus, I'd suggest a release now, then work (request for help noted) on the comments issues for the next release. Many a fine OSS project has died because their leads are perfectionists :) Regards, - Paul On Apr 4, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: qdox-152 will be confirmed this weekend. There are three issues about javadoccomments (QDOX-82, QDOX-146 and QDOX-154) It would be nice to resolve them all at once, but this requires some rewriting of the lexer and of course their Lexer-tests the idea is: define the following variables as expressions JavadocCommentStart JavadocCommentSeparator JavadocAnnotation JavadocCommentEnd then you can read everything per line, no more need to define some stange behaviour-code on "*" and so on. some extra hands would be nice here ;) I haven't heard there's a need for a quick release yet. At the moment maven's javadoc-plugin will get an extra goal, javadoc:fix With this goal it's possible to add javadoc-comments on your working sourcecode. This goal uses almost everything qdox offers. qdox-1.10 will contain fixes for this plugin, it would be nice to cover all it's issues. some other updates: QDOX-151 (toString()) is in progress. I think I've covered almost every JavaModel object. Some extra tests would be nice. regards Robert From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:56:07 -0700 Subject: [qdox-dev] Re: missing jar deps while building model what's the status on http://archive.codehaus.org/lists/org.codehaus.qdox.dev/msg/[email protected] is this the same as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/qdox-152 ? They sound like the same thing. You've fixed 152 though right? It should be easy for me to checkout successive tags for qdox and try out the same testcase. Of course, the root of this thread saw me promising to dig deeper before ! I'm sure we're due a release soon enough, with the mountain of good work you've done recently Robert. - Paul Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger _________________________________________________________________ What can you do with the new Windows Live? Find out http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx
