2009/1/14 Aidan Skinner <aidan.skin...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ReturnUnroutableMandatoryMessageTest should be moved into some sort of >> protocol version specific test folder. For instance that test >> *should* pass if run against Rabbit or OpenAMQ (do we split out or >> system tests between generic AMQP and "Qpid specific"?, but the notion >> of "mandatory" is different in 0-10 and will be different again in >> 1-0... > > We don't do any of that sort of splitting. We probably should, fixing > up systests is a bit of an open ended task though. ;) > > - Aidan > > -- > Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing > http://qpid.apache.org
I'd like to see some thought and design put in to our testing so we can have the tests: - Specify or Create configuration that is given to the broker vm/java/c++ - Specify the protocol that the test should be run or excluded from - Specify the broker type that the test should be run or excluded from My thoughts on this would be to use some sort of annotation that way you can tell when editing a test what it will run against rather than having to check a bunch of files and build.xml files for exclude details. Thoughts Martin -- Martin Ritchie
