2009/2/10 Carl Trieloff <[email protected]>: > >> Can I ask that either we add a "No Change Just Yet" option to this >> vote, or cancel this vote in favour of first establishing that the >> majority this that *now* is the correct time to change. >> >> While I can live with a 0.5 release I think that we are doing >> ourselves a disservice if we do not wait the one or so extra releases >> that would bring us up to interoperability between all the components >> and the chance to move to an X.0 release number (X to be determined). >> > > Rob, > > The 'M' is a PAIN to deal with on the C++ side, with the tool chain. Are you > ok doing 0.5 now > and 1.0 once we have interop over 0-10 with the Java broker? > > Carl.
The M is certainly a pain in many ways... And I would dearly love to be rid of it. I just think that there is nothing compelling and new that means we should do it now, rather than putting together a plan for what an X.0 release would mean, doing that and the rewarding ourselves with an X.0 release at the end of the process. I could certainly live with an 0.5 scheme, but I do feel that if we call a vote we should include all the options people have put forward. I also feel that when we come to numbering an X.0 release the X may not be 1. Almost all the components of Qpid are individually at a greater level of maturity than 0.5 would signify. If we bring everything up to the same level and have them interoperate I think we can reflect that. -- Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
