Robert Godfrey wrote:
2009/2/10 Carl Trieloff <[email protected]>:
Can I ask that either we add a "No Change Just Yet" option to this
vote, or cancel this vote in favour of first establishing that the
majority this that *now* is the correct time to change.
While I can live with a 0.5 release I think that we are doing
ourselves a disservice if we do not wait the one or so extra releases
that would bring us up to interoperability between all the components
and the chance to move to an X.0 release number (X to be determined).
Rob,
The 'M' is a PAIN to deal with on the C++ side, with the tool chain. Are you
ok doing 0.5 now
and 1.0 once we have interop over 0-10 with the Java broker?
Carl.
The M is certainly a pain in many ways... And I would dearly love to
be rid of it. I just think that there is nothing compelling and new
that means we should do it now, rather than putting together a plan
for what an X.0 release would mean, doing that and the rewarding
ourselves with an X.0 release at the end of the process.
I could certainly live with an 0.5 scheme, but I do feel that if we
call a vote we should include all the options people have put forward.
I also feel that when we come to numbering an X.0 release the X may
not be 1. Almost all the components of Qpid are individually at a
greater level of maturity than 0.5 would signify. If we bring
everything up to the same level and have them interoperate I think we
can reflect that.
is graduatation not a good enough reason, and that everyone wants to get
rid of it?
