2009/2/23 ffrenchm <ffrench.mathi...@gmail.com>: > About Derby Store is there any performances issue which has been raised. I > mean I'm a little dubious when comparing the different benchmarks I done > with QPid (JAVA / C++, persistent / non persistent). The bench bellow have > been done with the QPid benchmark tool on the same computer by sending 40000 > msg (1024 bytes) with a window of 1000. Is there any way to tune derby db to > get better performances ?
The BDB store is probably a better bet for performance and reliability - I know that the BDB store is used in production today and can definitely achieve better performance than below with batches of 1000. RG --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
