Bryan, Sorry I don't know enough about the legal side to say if this is ok or not. It might be a good idea to ask the apache legal folks.
Regards, Rajith On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Bryan Kearney<bkear...@redhat.com> wrote: > Rajith Attapattu wrote: >> >> Bryan, >> >> If JBoss code is needed for building then it might be an issue as >> JBoss is using LGPL. >> Any libraries that are checked into the lib dir in the project has to >> have a compatible license. >> >> An alternative would be to use some form of abstraction with reflection. >> This prevents the need for having JBoss libraries at compile time. >> I used a similar strategy to support Realtime Java constructs. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rajith >> > > > Rajith: > > Thanks for the feedback. I was assuming a model where to build the contrib > stuff the developer would need to download additional bits. Would that > alleviate the issue? Or just add new issues? > > -- bk > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
