On 12/04/2009 06:44 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I like the direction your taking with that. Whilst not exactly my
preferred colour choices (big fan of white background for content, not
so keen on brown'ish colours in general), as its infinitely more
pleasing to the eye than our existing site I could totally overlook
that ;)
I would definitely like to see a new design in place for the 0.6
release, even if for nothing other than the front page...first
impressions and all that.
+1
I have to agree on the nit about the brown colors, but even so, it
definitely looks many orders of magnitude better than what we have.
Nice work!
I agree. And I think static HTML really is best for the main page, and
for the navigation pages.
Two nits:
The word "Introduction" could be replaced by something more specific.
We really should not call these brokers "Java Broker
<http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid/#>" and "C++ Broker
(Linux/Windows) <http://people.apache.org/%7Erajith/qpid/#>", that
implies that they are for messaging in a specific language environment.
Jonathan
