Hi Rob,
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 19:53 +0100, Robert Godfrey wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> I've done a few updates for the Java Broker side of things... A couple
> of questions
>
> Producer Flow Control: there is a link from this feature to a
> non-existent page...
Correct - The syntax for an internal wiki link from inside an
{html}...{html} block is not yet correct... I just wanted to show that
all (most?) of the features listed should have a link. Also I also want
us to figure out *where* we want this to point. Do we:
* Create a new set of feature description pages?
or
* Can we point to existing pages which contain suitable short and
succinct descriptions (better, if it already exists)?
> The Java broker does provide producer Flow Control although only
> currently for 0-8/0-9/0-9-1 ... if someone can point at how producer
> flow control is done in 0-10 on the C++ Broker we can look to provide
> the same functionality in the same way
We can add a qualified "Y" for this using a footnote.
> Priority Queues: These have been in the Java Broker for ages... I
> would have hoped that they have been implemented in a compatible way
> on the C++ broker - but I have seen no discussion on this. Can
> someone point to the documentation around this for the C++
> implementation.
Gordon?
>
> On a related note what does Priority Delivery in "Client Features" mean?
Good question - this may be the same as Priority Queue. ie the ability
to reorder the delivery of messages based on priority - the client can
set the priority level below which messages are not delivered. This
should not be set to a "Y" here - I don't believe that C++ has this
feature yet. QPID-529 - Message Priority? Gordon, can you confirm?
>
> Can you also be a little clearer on what each of the "External Tools" is?
These are separate tools to accomplish management tasks. In the case of
the C++ broker, I am thinking of qpid-tool, qpid-config, qpid-cluster,
etc. I don't want to use those names, as they are implementation
dependent. Theoretically, if you support QMF, the python tools should
work.
>
> More generally it would be useful I think to put in the version we are
> planning on having certain features delivered in. For instance for
> the next release of Qpid from Apache (0.8?) the Java Broker should
> have QMF, Federation and LVQ in... however AMQP 1-0 is a while off I
> think... so having them both as "P" is a little misleading.
How about adding another category - "R" or "+" for "Next release", while
"P" means sometime beyond that?
>
> Hope this helps,
> Rob
Great, thanks for looking it over and adding to the matrix.
Kim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
