On 02/23/2010 10:36 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I've uploaded qpid-0.6rc6 and I think that we are ready for a vote immediately:
Thanks to Rajith the files that were in violation of the Apache rules on
licenses now have license texts.
The only differences between rc6 and rc5 are non-functional, so if you
tested rc5 at all and you voted +1, you should have every reason to vote
+1 again!
Therefore I'd like to call for a vote to release this release candidate
(0.6rc6) "as is" relabelled as 0.6. In other words the identical source
bits as rc6 except changing the name.
You should find qpid-0.6rc6 at:
http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc6
The subversion revision is: 909632
( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/qpid )
The rules for a release vote are:
( http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes )
* Simple majority required.
* No veto votes
* At least 3 + votes.
I propose that we consider all commiter votes not just "binding" PMC
votes.
I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At that point I
will total the votes.
Please vote in a message replying to this one to make it easier to find
the votes.
It goes without saying (well clearly not) that if you vote yes you
should have a reason to think that the release is good enough - I'd
suggest downloading whatever you know most about and trying it.
It looks fine to me (c++ tests and python tests against the c++ broker
run, python management tools run ok). Running RAT against it also looks
ok except for ruby/ext/sasl/extconf.rb. That file is tiny, but it is
code and it doesn't have the license at the top.
(There are some csproj files in the 0-10 dotnet client that also don't
have this, e.g. dotnet/client-010/client/Client.csproj, but these may
not be required?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
