> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 02/23/2010 10:36 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > >> > >> I've uploaded qpid-0.6rc6 and I think that we are ready for a vote > >> immediately: > >> > >> Thanks to Rajith the files that were in violation of the > Apache rules > >> on licenses now have license texts. > >> > >> The only differences between rc6 and rc5 are non-functional, so if > >> you tested rc5 at all and you voted +1, you should have > every reason > >> to vote > >> +1 again! > >> > >> Therefore I'd like to call for a vote to release this release > >> candidate > >> (0.6rc6) "as is" relabelled as 0.6. In other words the > identical source > >> bits as rc6 except changing the name. > >> > >> You should find qpid-0.6rc6 at: > >> http://qpid.apache.org/dist/qpid-0.6rc6 > >> > >> The subversion revision is: 909632 > >> ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/qpid ) > >> > >> The rules for a release vote are: > >> ( http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes ) > >> > >> * Simple majority required. > >> * No veto votes > >> * At least 3 + votes. > >> > >> I propose that we consider all commiter votes not just > "binding" PMC > >> votes. > >> > >> I also propose to run the vote until Tue 2 Mar 2010. At > that point I > >> will total the votes. > >> > >> Please vote in a message replying to this one to make it easier to > >> find the votes. > >> > >> It goes without saying (well clearly not) that if you vote yes you > >> should have a reason to think that the release is good > enough - I'd > >> suggest downloading whatever you know most about and trying it. > > > > It looks fine to me (c++ tests and python tests against the > c++ broker > > run, python management tools run ok). Running RAT against it also > > looks ok except for ruby/ext/sasl/extconf.rb. That file is > tiny, but > > it is code and it doesn't have the license at the top. > Oh dear, looks like I missed it. > > > (There are some csproj files in the 0-10 dotnet client that > also don't > > have this, e.g. dotnet/client-010/client/Client.csproj, but > these may > > not be > > required?) > > If I add the license text to those csproj files, VC++ will > complain. I added it last time around and steve had to remove them.
I did??? It's a problem if the license text is first in the file; I remember having to move it down after the first line (which has special characters in it that Windows or MSVC use to detect the project version). -Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
