On 03/31/2011 08:08 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
Also, I forgot to add, should we not move the code into an "attic" or something. If we're not going to support the codebase, lets be very clear about it?
Yes, we should also modify the svn directory structure in some way to make it obvious that the code for those components is no longer being actively maintained.
However for 0-10 my most immediate concern is simply not publishing obviously stale artefacts as I believe that gives a very misleading picture to users. I'd like to go ahead with the vote for that aspect and then have a separate debate resulting in some proposals for an attic area or alternatives.
Anyone with thoughts or preferences on the ideal changes to svn structure, please respond.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
