On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:14:33PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > >My proposal didn't seek to match http really, rather unify what was > >there. > > Right, but what is there is there in general because it sought to > match http. That is the only reason I don't reject that unofficial > form entirely: it is at least somewhat logical to anyone familiar > with http urls (which I think is pretty much every potential user of > Qpid). > > >Because of the clear lack of syntactic ambiguity I actually > >prefer using "/" as a separator. > > I would prefer using ':' to match http as I think that will be more > intuitive to users.
+1 -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpXBCzLe4YQD.pgp
Description: PGP signature