On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:14:33PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
> >My proposal didn't seek to match http really, rather unify what was
> >there.
> 
> Right, but what is there is there in general because it sought to
> match http. That is the only reason I don't reject that unofficial
> form entirely: it is at least somewhat logical to anyone familiar
> with http urls (which I think is pretty much every potential user of
> Qpid).
> 
> >Because of the clear lack of syntactic ambiguity I actually
> >prefer using "/" as a separator.
> 
> I would prefer using ':' to match http as I think that will be more
> intuitive to users.

+1

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/

Attachment: pgpXBCzLe4YQD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to