On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:59:17PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > I modified the spout.pl example to do this for both the name and value > on properties pass in at the command line and they were seen by the Java > drain tool (yay!). > > So, narrowing down the goal slightly, WRT QPID-5067, do we want to 1) > require the users to explicitly called utf8::upgrade() on the property > name and value and assume that, whatever they pass in is correct, or do we > 2) assume it for them and upgrade the string in our porcelain layer? > > In this case, since message properties are always strings, the latter > seems to me to be the right path.
Any opinions on this? -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpwkBZCnHxGK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
