On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:59:17PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > I modified the spout.pl example to do this for both the name and value > on properties pass in at the command line and they were seen by the Java > drain tool (yay!). > > So, narrowing down the goal slightly, WRT QPID-5067, do we want to 1) > require the users to explicitly called utf8::upgrade() on the property > name and value and assume that, whatever they pass in is correct, or do we > 2) assume it for them and upgrade the string in our porcelain layer? > > In this case, since message properties are always strings, the latter > seems to me to be the right path.
Can't message properties also be integers? Does the spec disallow binary? Having said that, 2 seems sensible to me. Jimmy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
