> On Sept. 26, 2016, 10:16 p.m., Justin Ross wrote:
> > management/python/lib/qmf/client.py, line 171
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52280/diff/1/?file=1510382#file1510382line171>
> >
> >     Since we're making a fresh start, do we want to use studly method 
> > names?  Unless there's a compatibility reason, I'd go with 
> > this_sort_of_thing instead.

Actually there is a compat issue - QMF uses mixedCase so changing python 
props/methods that reflect QMF props/methods would involve trickery and be 
confusing. If we leave those alone to repsect QMF then making the non-QMF 
BrokerAgent methods different would be inconsistent. Since QMF Is a legacy 
thing anyway I'm inclined to just leave it, although I have experience with 
underscore-wobbleCase conversion from converting dispatch :)

What do you think?


- Alan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52280/#review150468
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 26, 2016, 9:34 p.m., Alan Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52280/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 26, 2016, 9:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Brian Bouterse and Justin Ross.
> 
> 
> Bugs: QPID-7439
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7439
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-cpp
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> qmf.client is a port of qpidtoolibs to the proton AMQP 1.0 client library.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   management/python/lib/qmf/client.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/CMakeLists.txt a1a33341f2100f951f9e2465bd1c5325453be0d1 
>   src/tests/qmf_client_tests.py PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/run_qmf_client_tests PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52280/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> New auto-test added, tests creating/deleting/binding/unbinding queues and 
> exchanges.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alan Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to