[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17319728#comment-17319728 ]
Charles E. Rolke commented on DISPATCH-1878: -------------------------------------------- Following on to pull request #1110. Attaching a trace showing the proton event startup sequence for a success case and a failed hang case. See file DISPATCH-1878_fail-pn-raw-closed-before-ingress-stream-set-up.svg The TCP adaptor is expecting to see 1) PN_RAW_CONNECTION_CONNECTED followed by 2) PN_RAW_CONNECTION_WAKE. The WAKE will cause a few code trips through handle_incoming_impl function where it waits for the ingress delivery and stream message to get set up. During listener connection setup handle_incoming expects pn_raw_connection_is_read_closed() to return false. In the failed case the first events are 1) PN_RAW_CONNECTION_CONNECTED and 2) PN_RAW_CONNECTION_NEED_WRITE_BUFFERS. The first call to handle_incoming sees pn_raw_connection_is_read_closed() return true. This causes the receive listener connection to run state handling before the ingress delivery and stream messaage is set up. > Client app not getting a response through tcpListener > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DISPATCH-1878 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-1878 > Project: Qpid Dispatch > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Protocol Adaptors > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Fernando Giorgetti > Assignee: Charles E. Rolke > Priority: Major > Attachments: D-1878 @e148c.svg, dispatch-1878-trace.html > > > I have a tcp-echo server running locally through: > podman run -d --rm --name tcpecho -p 9090:9090 quay.io/skupper/tcp-go-echo > And I have a router configured with a tcpConnector to localhost at port 9090 > and a tcpListener at port 9999. > I am able to use nc (netcat) to send data to the tcp-echo directly (port > 9090) or through > the router (port 9999), if I run "nc 127.0.0.1 9999" and the send the data. > But if I run it as: "echo abcd | nc 127.0.0.1 9999" I am not seeing a > response, but if > I use port 9090 (original port) instead of 9999 (router tcpListener), then I > get the > response correctly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org