A few seconds ago, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> 2010/10/10 Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org>:
> > I like mixing definitions and expressions -- maybe the bodies of
> > `cond' etc should also allow it?
>
> In
>
> > (define (foo x)
> > (when (even? x) (define x (add1 x)) (printf "increment\n"))
> > x)
>
> is the scope of the definition (define x ...) the entire body of foo ?
No, I meant that that wouldn't work. I'm basically suggesting a
simple change -- just wrapping the bodies of these forms in a
(let () [...]).
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
