On 02/20/2011 10:37 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
Here's a proposal that attempts to synthesise prior discussion. It support the features I want without imposing overhead on Eli.
I'm starting to think we're going about this the wrong way. I predict that if we continue, this discussion will devolve into an exchange of "too simple! too simple!" and "too complex! too complex!".
Here's a new proposal. I'll convert the rackunit gui to use my proposed result type (probably with minor changes). Any other test framework maintainer can design a result type that models their own testing framework, and I'll write a conversion function from their type to mine. I believe the type I proposed subsumes the others, and I don't think anyone has expressed interest in the arrows going the other direction.
Then we can continue this discussion with more concrete experience. Ryan _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
