On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Ryan Culpepper <ry...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > I predict that if we continue, this discussion will devolve into an exchange > of "too > simple! too simple!" and "too complex! too complex!".
No, that's where we started. ;-P I thought my proposal quite elegantly combined the conflicting views (though I didn't address construction vs. execution, but that was deliberately deferred). > Here's a new proposal. I'll convert the rackunit gui to use my proposed > result type (probably with minor changes). Any other test framework > maintainer can design a result type that models their own testing framework, > and I'll write a conversion function from their type to mine. I believe the > type I proposed subsumes the others, and I don't think anyone has expressed > interest in the arrows going the other direction. Well, ok. N. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
