Match patterns are macro-extensible. Just about any s-expression is a potential match pattern. I don't think there's anything for a syntax class to discern, just accept whatever someone puts there, and trust expansion to sort out any errors.
Carl Eastlund On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:20 AM, John Clements <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > If I want to use syntax-parse to define a syntactic form that expands into a > use of 'match', is there a built-in syntax class that > recognizes 'match' patterns? Unfortunately, searching for 'match' and > 'pattern' in the syntax-parse docs isn't so helpful... :). > > John _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
