On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > Match patterns are macro-extensible. Just about any s-expression is a > potential match pattern. I don't think there's anything for a syntax > class to discern, just accept whatever someone puts there, and trust > expansion to sort out any errors.
Good point. That makes sense, thanks. John > > Carl Eastlund > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:20 AM, John Clements > <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >> If I want to use syntax-parse to define a syntactic form that expands into a >> use of 'match', is there a built-in syntax class that >> recognizes 'match' patterns? Unfortunately, searching for 'match' and >> 'pattern' in the syntax-parse docs isn't so helpful... :). >> >> John _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
