On Tue, 10 May 2011 23:58:07 -0300, David Bremner <brem...@debian.org> wrote:
> I don't claim to understand all the implications yet, but the following > patch seems to work, i.e. catching both SIGSEGV and SIGBUS with the same > handler. As a followup, I talked a bit more to the Debian/kFreeBSD developers and my current understanding is that which signal (SIGBUS or SIGSEGV) is received is determined by the version of libc the binary is run under. So the most robust solution (from the narrow perspective of running on different/upgraded kFreeBSD systems) is indeed to catch both signals. One could of course do that for FreeBSD systems in general, but don't know what the tradeoffs are. David _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
