At Wed, 11 May 2011 10:25:57 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2011 23:58:07 -0300, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't claim to understand all the implications yet, but the following > > patch seems to work, i.e. catching both SIGSEGV and SIGBUS with the same > > handler. > > As a followup, I talked a bit more to the Debian/kFreeBSD developers and > my current understanding is that which signal (SIGBUS or SIGSEGV) is > received is determined by the version of libc the binary is run under. > So the most robust solution (from the narrow perspective of running on > different/upgraded kFreeBSD systems) is indeed to catch both signals. > One could of course do that for FreeBSD systems in general, but don't > know what the tradeoffs are.
I finally pushed (a slight variant of) your patch. Thanks! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
