Anyone seconds this?
And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I
know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.)
Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate.
>
> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org>:
> > Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right'
> > versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
