I'd really like #:unless as well iPhoneから送信
On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Anyone seconds this? > > And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I > know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) > > > > Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate. >> >> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org>: >>> Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' >>> versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
