10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm > > suggesting allowing both orders for this case. > > I did not mention this (remaining silent in response to your comment > with the word 'flame' in the original message), but I am strongly > against this choice.
(Well, I didn't want flames, but I did want to hear +1s and -1s.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev