At Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:15:58 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > In any case, I do take compatibility as a priority, so I'm suggesting > > allowing both orders for this case. > > I did not mention this (remaining silent in response to your comment > with the word 'flame' in the original message), but I am strongly > against this choice.
+1 Allowing both orders sounds like it would lead to a lot of confusion and make code harder to read. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
