What I meant is that I don't see what is wrong with your code, not that I don't see check-docs complaining.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > What's wrong is that for typed/scheme check-docs thinks that -> is > undocumented, even though it's able to find the docs for the same > identifier provided from typed/racket. > > It's the same problem as with with-handlers, but if appears not to have the > same cause. > > On Jun 24, 2011 8:53 PM, "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> > wrote: >> >> I'm not seeing something wrong. Maybe it would help if you could make >> a smaller example. >> >> Robby >> >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Robby Findler >> > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >> So I think the fix is to do the renaming for with-handlers before it >> >> gets exported from typed-scheme/base-env/prims (or introduce another >> >> module and put that one in the #:use-sources and use it as the one >> >> where the re-providing is happening). >> > >> > Ok, I did this, and it worked nicely. Thanks! >> > >> > Unfortunately, the issue with `->' seems to be different. In >> > particular, `->' in `typed/scheme' and in `typed/racket' are both >> > defined in "typed-scheme/base-env/base-types-extra.rkt", under the >> > name `->', and it isn't renamed in between. Other identifiers, such >> > as `U', are defined in the same place, and treated identically, but >> > the docs for `U' work just fine. >> > -- >> > sam th >> > sa...@ccs.neu.edu >> > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
