Ah, I see. Well, that makes two of us. I'll try to make a small example collection.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > What I meant is that I don't see what is wrong with your code, not > that I don't see check-docs complaining. > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> What's wrong is that for typed/scheme check-docs thinks that -> is >> undocumented, even though it's able to find the docs for the same >> identifier provided from typed/racket. >> >> It's the same problem as with with-handlers, but if appears not to have the >> same cause. >> >> On Jun 24, 2011 8:53 PM, "Robby Findler" <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not seeing something wrong. Maybe it would help if you could make >>> a smaller example. >>> >>> Robby >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> >>> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Robby Findler >>> > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> So I think the fix is to do the renaming for with-handlers before it >>> >> gets exported from typed-scheme/base-env/prims (or introduce another >>> >> module and put that one in the #:use-sources and use it as the one >>> >> where the re-providing is happening). >>> > >>> > Ok, I did this, and it worked nicely. Thanks! >>> > >>> > Unfortunately, the issue with `->' seems to be different. In >>> > particular, `->' in `typed/scheme' and in `typed/racket' are both >>> > defined in "typed-scheme/base-env/base-types-extra.rkt", under the >>> > name `->', and it isn't renamed in between. Other identifiers, such >>> > as `U', are defined in the same place, and treated identically, but >>> > the docs for `U' work just fine. >>> > -- >>> > sam th >>> > sa...@ccs.neu.edu >>> > >> > -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
