I agree with most of your points, and will fix the document accordingly. At Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:02:26 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > I'd also like feedback on the document itself. It's not especially > > detailed, and I'm sure I forgot a lot of useful things. > > * xrepl should be mentioned at the top, since its main goal is to make > it easy to live with *any* random editor, even notepad. The > specific highlights to mention is that it gives you an ,enter > command to go into a module and an ,edit command that can be used to > invoke your $EDITOR on a file (and it defaults to the file you > entered into). Also, there's a ,drracket command that can start > drracket, which makes it easy to use <random editor> to write code, > and drracket to test things.
I didn't want to repeat information that was already in the xrepl documentation, but you're right that highlighting some of the features is probably a good idea. > * Also might good to mention that Neil is in the process of writing > something new? I'm planning to add it once he releases it. > * Did you verify that paredit treats []s properly? (At least at some > point in the past I think that it didn't.) I've been using paredit daily for years, and I don't recall having any issues. > * `check-requires' is even less important than that... Including it > means including a whole bunch of other things (for example, the > macro stepper's textual interface). If anything, add it as an xrepl > command. Adding it to xrepl is a good idea. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
