At Fri, 5 Aug 2011 03:22:07 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > The problem is that the meta collection is not intended for > distribution. Even if it's moved to some collection that will get > included, it's an abuse of what `collects' means at the moment.
I see. How about a `contrib' directory at the top level of the distribution? That would be a good place if we ever want to distribute, say, quack as part of the Racket distribution. > > > * `check-requires' is even less important than that... Including > > > it means including a whole bunch of other things (for example, > > > the macro stepper's textual interface). If anything, add it as > > > an xrepl command. > > > > Adding it to xrepl is a good idea. > > Tell me how to call it, and I'll add it. `check-requires' sounds good. Maybe with `cr' as an available abbreviation? As for inclusion in xrepl, `show-requires' (from `macro-debugger/analysis/check-requires.rkt') may be a better starting point than `check-requires-script.rkt'. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
